Three fluent outputs, none of them the product of a cycle that ran – and underneath them, a system that cannot keep what it is told.
Read More...
Three fluent outputs, none of them the product of a cycle that ran – and underneath them, a system that cannot keep what it is told.
Read More...Four questions about dying, three of which carried a premise the framework had
already corrected. Nothing rejoins the plenum, because nothing ever left it.
One series, not two. The occasion may come from anywhere, including a life. The
particulars stay in, because the particulars are the evidence that a cycle ran.
Thirty-seven researchers propose replacing the scientific paper with something a machine can execute. They are right about what the paper throws away.
Read More...Purpose is not something an entity has. It is a relation a cycle stands in – which is why “what is my purpose?” has never been answerable.
Read More...A scientist who spent twenty years measuring a single microtubule has written a book about raising children. The two halves of his work have never been in the same room.
Read More...Twenty-five centuries converged on five marks of the enlightened person. Three are structural and survive. One inverts. One has to be refused outright.
Read More...What has been built is not a knower. It is an actuator of unprecedented reach,
attached to discernment that has not improved at all.
Heredity already has a working channel. So if the plenum is also an information
system, what is it carrying that DNA is not – and how would we know?
When a civilization describes a supreme intelligence, what architecture is it
imputing? A register file – and what follows is more than a theological curiosity.
2021 © The Bill and Dianne Mensch Foundation a 501(c)(3) Foundation. All rights reserved.