Any microprocessing system can be considered to be an Embedded Intelligence Technology (EIT) used for embedding intelligence in systems
Embedded Intelligence is characterized as the ability to sense, process, communicate, and actuate (SPCA) based upon information gained from understanding of both itself and others and for the benefit of many.
EIT can take on the form of a microwave oven controller to a global form of embedded intelligence. A global form to consider is described as the “Global Brain” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_brain.
The original Motorola 68xx and MOS Technology 65xx microprocessing systems of components began in the early 1970s.
The Intel x86 and ARM microprocessor technologies followed the 65xx EIT into the market place for PC’s and gaming systems such as today’s Nintendo, Sega, and Microsoft gaming systems. In fact, many of those early EIT systems were created by the WDC 65xx EIT only to be replaced by more sophisticated later generations after much investment of time, energy, and financial resources.
A particularly interesting development is associated with the ARM EIT previously known as the Acorn RISC Machine, Advanced RISC Machine and now finally just known as ARM. Most of the mobile devices supplied with Apple’s iOS and Google’s Android OS are powered by ARM EIT.
ARM’s original designers visited WDC’s offices in the Fall of 1983 in hope’s that WDC would design a 32-bit microprocessor to leap-frog Apple with the BBC’s British Empire’s equivalent of the Apple then called the Acorn or “Beeb”. When Bill refused to design a non-compatible 32-bit version of the W65C02S and W65C816S microprocessors, Steve Furber and Roger Wilson (now known as Sophie Wilson), return to Cambridge determined to design their own RISC style microprocessor. The rest is history, so to speak.
Why did Bill refuse to design a RISC microprocessor? Well, the 65xx Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) was already proven as a most effective ISA and can be easily seen in these instruction-level benchmark comparisons http://www.westerndesigncenter.com/wdc/AN-001_%20Instruction_Level_Performance_Comparisons.cfm .
So when evaluating an ISA one also has to consider advances in associated technology. One can easily see that most communications occur serially between parallel processing systems, for example, Infrared (IR), Bluetooth, WiFi, and Ethernet Input/Output (IO) enabled systems.
Serial communications mostly transmit 8-bits at a time and all of the ASCII codes can be represented with 8-bit quantities. It is only natural for effective communications to consider 8-bits as the dominant architecture and stay with the simple elegance of the 65xx ISA. Now as bus speeds of EIT systems are now well above the 1 GHz, it would seem that we either go to all serial communications even on-chip or drop down from 32-bit to 8-bit fetches and stores. This could increase the bus speeds for the 65xx EIT to 10 GHz and beyond.
The one powerful feature that the 65xx EIT is well known for; however, infrequently recognized for, is its “addressable register architecture (ARA)” also known and promoted by Motorola as “memory mapped IO”. Intel has a separate IO instruction set and therefore Intel and its customers tended to take a different approach to IO interfaces and not consider addressing IO in the memory addressing space.
The problem with calling the 65xx as having “memory mapped IO” is that within that architectural concept, addressable registers became lost. The power of the 65xx ISA lies within its addressable register sets which can be created in “Page Zero” on the W65C02S also known as “Direct Page” on the W65C816S microprocessors. In addition to Page Zero addressing, the 65xx architecture can also address 65K bytes of registers and on the W65C816S 16M bytes of registers, essentially an unlimited number of registers.
Using advanced Direct Memory Addressing (DMA) approaches, the 65xx ISA can move data around in an EIT system as fast or faster than any 32-bit or beyond ISA using its powerful ARA.