The TEI in the Wild series is currently organized by theme — nine bands running from the foundations of the framework through physics, civics, myth, and reciprocity. That organization serves a reader. It does not serve an academic adviser. This document re-sorts the same essays by the question an adviser actually has to answer: which department signs the form, and under which existing mechanism.

I. The Three Doors

An alignment document that ignores mechanism is a wish list. Franke Honors offers exactly three doors through which outside material can enter a student’s degree, and they are not the same size. Everything that follows is sorted with these in view.

Alongside those three sits Franke’s own curriculum: the one-unit Honors seminars, and the Bachelor of Creative Intelligence and Innovation, which can only be earned in combination with another major and whose capstone is designed to align with the Honors Thesis requirement. That last fact is the most important structural detail in this document. It is the seam through which a framework can enter without anyone being asked to build a new course.

II. The Organizing Principle

The series is re-sorted here into three tiers rather than nine themes. The tiers correspond to the doors, not to the subject matter. An essay’s tier tells an adviser what size of commitment it can support; its college tells them who signs.

Each essay is given one primary home. Cross-listings are noted where a second college has a real claim, but the primary assignment is deliberate: an alignment that lists every essay under every plausible department is not an alignment, it is a concordance, and it hands the adviser back the work it was meant to do for them.

III. Tier One — Franke Honors’ Own Curriculum

These twelve need no host department. They are about the formation of intelligence itself, and several are about Franke Honors specifically. They belong in the one-unit seminars, in BCII challenge-question framing, and in thesis-prospectus preparation.

IV. Tier Two — Independent Study and Honors Contract, by College

Fifty-five essays, sorted by the college that would host the study. Department attributions reflect the University’s current structure and should be confirmed against the catalogue before circulation.

College of Engineering

Franke engineers carry their own track: seven honors units for design work in the major, and the interdisciplinary senior capstone may fulfil the honors thesis. Governance embedded in the fabric is a design problem, which places this cluster inside the capstone rather than beside it.

College of Information Science

Data science, machine learning, and cyber operations. The strongest natural fit outside Engineering, and the one where an honors contract on an existing course requires the least translation.

College of Science — Physics, Astronomy & Mathematics

The heaviest concentration in the series, and the one most likely to be read sceptically by faculty — which is the point of assigning it here.

College of Science — Neuroscience, Cognitive Science & Psychology

Three essays that make empirically checkable claims about where intelligence resides.

College of Science — Lunar & Planetary Laboratory / Arizona Astrobiology Center

The Foundation’s Mensch Prize is already present at the Arizona Astrobiology Center, which makes this the shortest institutional distance of any cluster here.

College of Science — Chemistry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

College of Social & Behavioral Sciences — Philosophy

The seam where the framework is most exposed and therefore most usefully tested. An adviser should expect these to come back argued with.

College of Social & Behavioral Sciences — Government & Public Policy

Self-government read as the same cycle at national scale. Six essays, enough for a sustained sequence.

College of Social & Behavioral Sciences — American Indian Studies

These require the most care in placement. They should be taught with Indigenous faculty leading, not applied to Indigenous lifeways from outside — a caution the second essay makes explicitly, which is the reason it can be offered here at all.

College of Social & Behavioral Sciences — Anthropology, Sociology & Linguistics

College of Humanities

Religious Studies and Classics is the natural host; Public and Applied Humanities is the alternative for students wanting an applied capstone.

Eller College of Management

Management information systems, entrepreneurship, and business ethics. Thin in count, strong in fit — and reinforced by the Engineering cross-listing of the fabless licensing story.

James E. Rogers College of Law

The University’s undergraduate law major makes this live rather than aspirational. One primary assignment, but four strong cross-listings: the patent essay, the organizational-blindness essay, the constitutional essay, and the executive-order essay all belong in a law reading list.

College of Education

Educational psychology and sociocultural studies. One primary assignment; the Tier One formation essays and the fifth-hijacker essay all cross-list here, and in practice this college draws on five.

Colleges of Public Health, Health Sciences & Nursing

Franke’s own Human Health and Values minor is the most natural landing place for the third of these.

V. Tier Three — Thesis-Scale Clusters

Six units and a year of work need more than a single essay. Ten clusters in the series carry that weight, each already written as a sequence to be read in order:

VI. What This Document Does Not Claim

The framework’s own First Law holds that intelligence wants to know itself through an unbounded continuum of phenomena. A document that mapped a theory onto every college of a university and reported a clean fit everywhere would be evidence of a closed cycle, not an open one. So the honest accounting:

The fit is uneven, and the unevenness is real. Engineering, information science, philosophy, and government take the material naturally. Law and education are thin on primary assignments and are carried mostly by cross-listings. Optical sciences, veterinary medicine, applied science and technology, and architecture have no primary placement here at all. Those gaps have been left visible rather than filled, because filling them would have meant manufacturing an affinity to protect the appearance of completeness.

Nor does an essay’s placement in a department constitute the department’s assent. Everything above is an offer, made from outside the University, describing where the material would sit if faculty found it worth their students’ time. The faculty decide that, not the Foundation — and an adviser who reads a cluster and declines it has done exactly what an open cycle looks like from the inside.

One structural caution is worth stating plainly. The mechanism that makes this easiest — the honors contract, added to a course the student is already taking — is also the mechanism with the least faculty oversight. Material that enters a curriculum through the path of least resistance enters without being tested by it. Where a choice exists, the independent study and the thesis are the better doors, precisely because they are harder to walk through.

· · ·

Share your understanding!